First time here? Check our help page!
2

What does the EnergyPlus warning "Inside surface heat balance did not converge" mean?

I have an Energy Plus file with the following warnings in the .err report:

 ** Warning ** Inside surface heat balance did not converge with Max Temp Difference [C] =2.501E-003 vs Max Allowed Temp Diff [C] =2.000E-003
 **   ~~~   **  During Sizing, Environment=SUMMER DESIGN DAY IN UNTITLED (01-01:31-12) JUL, at Simulation time=07/15 15:00 - 15:10
 ** Warning ** Inside surface heat balance did not converge with Max Temp Difference [C] =2.401E-003 vs Max Allowed Temp Diff [C] =2.000E-003
 **   ~~~   **  During Sizing, Environment=SUMMER DESIGN DAY IN UNTITLED (01-01:31-12) JUL, at Simulation time=07/15 17:10 - 17:20
 ** Warning ** Inside surface heat balance did not converge with Max Temp Difference [C] =2.247E-003 vs Max Allowed Temp Diff [C] =2.000E-003
 **   ~~~   **  During Sizing, Environment=SUMMER DESIGN DAY IN UNTITLED (01-01:31-12) AUG, at Simulation time=08/15 15:20 - 15:30

I'm not clear what is indicated by this, if I need to worry about it or not, and if I do need to worry about it, what I might try to correct the problem.

Additionally, I'm confused that the recurring error summary at the bottom of the .err file says the error occurred zero times during Sizing, but the prior error messages indicate that they occurred during Sizing?

  ************* ===== Recurring Error Summary =====
  ************* The following recurring error messages occurred.
  *************
  *************  ** Warning ** Inside surface heat balance convergence problem continues
  *************  **   ~~~   **   This error occurred 749 total times;
  *************  **   ~~~   **   during Warmup 0 times;
  *************  **   ~~~   **   during Sizing 0 times.
  *************  **   ~~~   **   Max=150.135654 [C]  Min=1.988373E-003 [C]
  *************

Update 3/16/2018: I ran the file with 12 timesteps per hour as suggested in the answer from @Avi. The same errors still occur, and the number of occurrences reported in the error summary actually increased to 1101 times (previously 749 times). What else can I try?

Molly Curtz's avatar
1.3k
Molly Curtz
asked 2018-03-14 16:16:27 -0500, updated 2018-03-16 09:17:05 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag close merge delete

Comments

I have same error. What is unclear to me is that the reported Max temp diff (8.957E-005) is even lower than the Max Allowed Temp Diff [C] =2.000000E-003, so I really don't get it

The link provided by Avi did not solve the problem

Shalomated's avatar Shalomated (2023-03-12 07:35:29 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments

2 Answers

2

Here is the answer. If it will satisfy you please close the question.

Avi's avatar
4.3k
Avi
answered 2018-03-15 05:51:25 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

@Avi, thanks for pointing me to that post, which indicates that increasing the timestep may be a solution. I had not found that one on search.

I'm not closing my question, as I'd still like to know what the error means, why the summary says it did not occur during sizing while the individual warnings say it did occur during sizing, and what, if any, other methods could be used to mitigate the error. The model is ~700 zones, I am running it at 6 timesteps per hour, with only IdealAirHVAC and run time is 4.5 hours, so I'd prefer not to increase to 12 timesteps as the linked post recommends.

Molly Curtz's avatar Molly Curtz (2018-03-15 10:51:17 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments
0

I ran into this problem too. It is mainly due to the way you model your surfaces. It occurs for my case when I have a single large surface that is intersecting with multiple smaller surfaces. I have illustrated the case with a sketch below. Hope it helps.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tjZ6...

chenkianwee's avatar
1
chenkianwee
answered 2024-08-14 16:18:16 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

add a comment see more comments