1

high pressure sodium lights fraction radiant, visible, return air values?

I am using a high pressure sodium lights for modeling a grow room. I know the energy per space floor area value but couldn't really find values for fraction radiant, visible and return air. Do I need these values to represent the kind of lighting that I am using or just the energy density is enough? And where will I find these values?

siddharthpatil5's avatar
93
siddharthpatil5
asked 2016-07-31 16:32:00 -0500
__AmirRoth__'s avatar
4.4k
__AmirRoth__
updated 2016-07-31 16:46:17 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag close merge delete

Comments

Our first grow-room question? It's about time.

__AmirRoth__'s avatar __AmirRoth__ (2016-07-31 16:47:09 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments

2 Answers

3

Return air fraction is non-zero only if the lamps are recessed into a return air plenum, which they probably are not. Visible fraction (i.e., luminous efficiency) for high pressure sodium lamps is 12-22% according to Wikipedia. Radiant fraction is the remainder.

__AmirRoth__'s avatar
4.4k
__AmirRoth__
answered 2016-07-31 16:54:38 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

Just adding for posterity since the Wikipedia article's source is no longer online: Engineering Toolbox has efficacy values (not efficiency). The conversion from efficacy to efficiency is to divide by 683 lm/W

matt's avatar matt (2021-07-21 12:37:41 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments
1

You need to look at Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR). See http://agi32.com/blog/2014/12/10/phot...

rpg: oh, I see. Never mind.

Randolph M. Fritz's avatar
101
Randolph M. Fritz
answered 2016-08-02 11:24:09 -0500, updated 2016-08-02 15:56:10 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

1

PAR is only relevant to the plant growth bit. I believe the OP is merely interested in defining the luminaires correctly with respect to the building energy model, Randolph. Believe it or not, Amir's answer -- complete with Wikipedia reference -- is a better one, given the context.

rpg777's avatar rpg777 (2016-08-02 11:46:43 -0500) edit

Even I can't believe it!

__AmirRoth__'s avatar __AmirRoth__ (2016-08-02 16:44:01 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments