2

any thoughts about simulating solar radiation/shading from Finite Element Method?

I want to simulate the building thermal response in a day's environment including solar radiation, outside air convection and inside air convection and radiation from Finite Element Software like Abaqus. It is really hard to realize the movable solar radiation and shades. Do you guys have any thoughts on that? And what about the theory behind solar radiation and shading from EnergyPlus which may be useful for me to understand the way of realizing in FEM? Thanks

Lantonshen's avatar
133
Lantonshen
asked 2020-09-02 23:33:23 -0500
__AmirRoth__'s avatar
4.4k
__AmirRoth__
updated 2020-09-16 17:18:48 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag close merge delete

Comments

Are you asking about using solar radiation and shading calculations from EnergyPlus as inputs to a finite element software for the remaining heat transfer calculations? That would be cosimulation -- using two simulation tools in parallel that share information between them. A common example is EnergyPlus + Modelica through the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB).

Aaron Boranian's avatar Aaron Boranian (2020-09-03 08:29:28 -0500) edit

Yes. Is that possible to use Abaqus+EnergyPlus through BCVTB?

Lantonshen's avatar Lantonshen (2020-09-03 09:29:20 -0500) edit

I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't use BCVTB for that, I was just using that as one example of EnergyPlus cosimulating with another tool. I've added an answer below for more details.

Aaron Boranian's avatar Aaron Boranian (2020-09-03 09:40:33 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments

1 Answer

1

If you want to have cosimulation between EnergyPlus and Abaqus, then you will need to use Functional Mock-Up units. Whether this is possible depends upon if Abaqus has this capability.

There are related posts on FMUs with EnergyPlus here (details on FMU compilation from other simulation tools) and here (machine learning)

Aaron Boranian's avatar
14.1k
Aaron Boranian
answered 2020-09-03 09:39:10 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

add a comment see more comments