First time here? Check our help page!
2

how is "Surplus Electricity Going To Utility" calculated?

May I ask how Surplus Electricity Going To Utility is calculated as reported in the Electric Loads Satisfied table in the html file ?

May I also ask why Net Electricity From Utility is not equal to Electricity Coming From Utility minus Total On-Site Electric Sources?

image description

oat's avatar
835
oat
asked 2017-12-05 03:48:46 -0500
__AmirRoth__'s avatar
4.4k
__AmirRoth__
updated 2017-12-05 15:12:34 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag close merge delete

Comments

Please tag with the specific software you're using if appropriate (energyplus here), and do not include greetings (thank you, hello, etc), per our convention. Thanks!

Julien Marrec's avatar Julien Marrec (2017-12-05 09:05:06 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments

1 Answer

2

At times your On-Site production is exporting to the grid because it is higher than the demand it needs to cover.

So in all, you bought from the Utility 1,436,312 kWh, but you also exported 6,236 kWh, so the Net is difference between the two, so 1,430,075 kWh.

If you didn't have On Site production, you would have bought 1,430,075 kWh + 284,130 kWh = 1,714,205 kWh.

Check out the Engineering Reference for Whole-Facility Electric Service

Julien Marrec's avatar
29.7k
Julien Marrec
answered 2017-12-05 08:56:55 -0500, updated 2017-12-05 09:02:10 -0500
edit flag offensive 0 remove flag delete link

Comments

Thanks, Julien. The table shown above is for a scenario in which we have "on-site production" through PV, if that is correct. So, should the net purchased electricity in this case be "1,430,075 = 1,714,205 - 284,130" (in kWh)?

oat's avatar oat (2017-12-15 23:40:35 -0500) edit
1

@oat: the equation you wrote is exactly the same as in my answer, except the 284,130 was moved from the left to the right of the equal sign ;)

Julien Marrec's avatar Julien Marrec (2017-12-19 03:41:51 -0500) edit

Yes, Julien, you are right. I think I misread your comment and thought you were saying that 1,714,205 is the number for "you would have bought".

oat's avatar oat (2017-12-19 06:19:48 -0500) edit

If that solves your problem, remember to mark the answer as accepted so the thread can be identified as resolved. Thanks

Julien Marrec's avatar Julien Marrec (2017-12-19 08:16:08 -0500) edit
add a comment see more comments