I ran the VariableRefrigerantFlow_5Zone example file and also changed the condenser type to EvaporativelyCooled. The results shown in the Component Sizing Summary using V8.4 appear correct.

The first table denotes the air-cooled air-cooled simulation while the second table reflects the results of the evap-cooled evap-cooled simulation. The results show the values for autosized input fields.

I ran the VariableRefrigerantFlow_5Zone example file and also changed the condenser type to EvaporativelyCooled. The results shown in the Component Sizing Summary using V8.4 appear correct. The first table denotes the air-cooled simulation while the second table reflects the results of the evap-cooled simulation. The results show the values for autosized input fields.

C:\fakepath\VRF_ComponentSummary.png

I ran the VariableRefrigerantFlow_5Zone example file and also changed the condenser type to EvaporativelyCooledEvaporitivelyCooled. The results shown in the Component Sizing Summary using V8.4 appear correct. The first table denotes the air-cooled simulation while the second table reflects the results of the evap-cooled simulation. The results show the values for autosized input fields.

C:\fakepath\VRF_ComponentSummary.png