I will show you a comment that still lingers in the code today.

 // CoolTools counterflow model does not work properly. The empirical model seems flawed
 // since the tower operates in the free convection regime on the design day.

I recall when this model was implemented. It was never determined if the implementation was incorrect or if the original model had flaws. I could probably track down the coefficients, but they would do no good since the simulation would result in warnings and errors.

I will show you a comment that still lingers in the code today.
today. // CoolTools counterflow model does not work properly. The empirical model seems flawed // since the tower operates in the free convection regime on the design day.

I recall when this model was implemented. It was never determined if the implementation was incorrect or if the original model had flaws. I could probably track down the coefficients, but they would do no good since the simulation would result in warnings and errors.

I will show you a comment that still lingers in the code today. today.

// CoolTools counterflow model does not work properly. The empirical model seems flawed
 // since the tower operates in the free convection regime on the design day.
day.

I recall when this model was implemented. It was never determined if the implementation was incorrect or if the original model had flaws. I could probably track down the coefficients, but they would do no good since the simulation would result in warnings and errors.

I will show you a comment that still lingers in the code today.

// CoolTools counterflow model does not work properly. The empirical model seems flawed
// since the tower operates in the free convection regime on the design day.

I recall when this model was implemented. It was never nover determined if the implementation was incorrect or if the original model had flaws. I could probably track down the coefficients, but they would do no good since the simulation would result in warnings and errors.